Are These Really The 8 Worst Movie Sequels Ever?
I met Aaron Chumbris at a recent writer’s conference we attended in Eastern Pennsylvania. Aaron’s a nice guy who likes to write about figments of his imagination such as the ones appearing in his YA fantasy novel Duality. He’s also joined us in the world of Twitter, so give him a follow before you check his website.
Aaron thinks that some movie sequels are just terrible and wrote this guest post to prove his point.
~*~*~*~
Police Academy Sequels
Police Academy gave us some classic cinematic characters: Bubba Smith’s imposing officer Hightower, the firepower-obsessed Tackleberry, and the ever-popular sound effects-based talents of Michael Winslow’s Larvell Jones. It also gave us a deluge of increasingly crappy sequels. I may be willing to vouch for the original trilogy, but beyond that I’ll probably change the channel on even the most boring and rainy Sunday afternoon.
The Godfather Part III
I love the first two Godfather films and believe they are among the greatest to ever to grace a movie screen. Yet I don’t think comparison is the biggest weakness of Part III. The biggest flaw is the story: who wants to see Michael Corleone as a legitimate businessman? We all know that’s the direction he wanted to go, but fate intervened and he became far more ruthless than his father, spilling the blood of his own brother. What made Michael great was his tragic perversion of the American Dream, a man who tried to reverse the inevitable path of his family’s legacy and paid a heavy price for his failure. Part III just drags out his suffering, making the audience suffer in the process.
Weekend at Bernie’s 2
How can you ruin a film that captures the madcap hilarity involved in carting around a decomposing corpse, passing him off as alive by putting sunglasses on him and thus keeping a hitman from realizing his target is already dead? By making a sequel where Bernie’s corpse must lead our protagonists to money hidden in the Virgin Islands, but only when he hears music! When the tagline is “You don’t have to stop partying just because you’ve stopped breathing,” you already know you’re in for something that stinks worse than a dead body in the tropical sun.
Jason X
Throwing a dash of science fiction into a long-running horror franchise might sound like a good way to revitalize it after so many sequels, but honestly, what was the point of this movie? The heretofore invincible Jason ends up in a future where people finally have weapons that can rip him to pieces, only to be reborn as an invincible cyborg. We already had horror and sci-fi meet in space. It was called Alien. It was awesome. Watch that and its excellent sequel instead.
The Matrix Reloaded
I won’t use this space to bash the film. There are tons of critical reviews that already pick it apart. Instead, I’ll praise it for its great special effects and inventive action sequences. But those two aspects alone do not make a great film. In the Wachowskis’ defense, I believe the fault lay not in The Matrix Reloaded, but the simple fact that The Matrix was simply too good to make a follow-up. When a film revolutionizes moviemaking the way it did, any effort to top it is likely to fail. And fail it did, so much so that I never bothered to watch the third one.
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Aside from adding to the annoying trend of adding the word “rise” to sequel names (can we stop that one, please?), Terminator 3 brought nothing new to the franchise, unless you consider a hot Terminator a revolutionary concept. I realize it’s not easy to fill James Cameron’s shoes, but if the best you have to offer is more of the same, why bother? Whether or not you liked Terminator: Salvation, at least it tried something different by taking place in the future we always heard about but rarely saw.
Big Momma’s House 2
When the first Big Momma’s House came out, I thought to myself, “Wow, Martin Lawrence must really need some money.” When the second one came out, I thought, “No one is that charitable.” What? There’s a third one? Does he really hate us all that much?
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
I loved The Mummy and thought The Mummy Returns was a respectable sequel, even if it never captured quite the same cinematic hold of the original. So when I heard the third movie would center around one of my favorite actors, Jet Li, I was hopeful about the end result. Unfortunately, I should’ve done like Rachel Weisz and kept clear of this one. Not only did it seem like Jet Li played second fiddle to his CGI double, but the movie had absolutely none of the appeal of the first film. It was full of nonstop action, which is great unless you care about little things like character or emotional investment, but anyone looking for fun or actual excitement is better off watching the first two again.
Do you agree with these picks?
What’s the worst sequel you’ve ever seen?
The Friday Flick Faceoff features films that share a common thread. Cast your vote anyway you like and don’t worry if you’ve seen all the movies or not. Love to hear why you picked what you picked though!
If you’ve got writing chops and would like to be considered as a guest poster for an FFF you can reach me through the Contact page.


Besides the Harry Potter franchise, I’m trying to think if there are any other sequels that I actually DO like? Hmmm…..
I think book-based sequels are almost always worthwhile–unless the book is bad–because they continue an ongoing story rather than draw out a tired premise.
You have to be Italian to catch the nuances in Godfather. The ability to absorb from and project into create and interaction with the film that non Italians cannot feel or understand.
Makin offers they can’t refuse.
I loved the first Mission: Impossible movie. I know, I know, the ‘purists’ already think I’ve betrayed them. But I don’t care. And I’m not even a Tom Cruise fan. I loved it.
Then the second one came out. I couldn’t even make it to the end. The first one that Brian de Palma directed was smart, suspenseful, character-driven. Then second one by John Woo was just an excuse to use every special effect explosion shot in the book. He turned it into a typical flashy/no substance action film and that pissed me off. Of course the rest of the sequels followed suit.
Mission: Impossible wasn’t an action series, it was about suspense, intrigue, and spies. John Woo completely ruined it.
The first MI was definitely the best. But I’m easy and liked the others too.
Ooh, I totally forgot (until watching it on cable recently) how horrid mission: impossible II is. Do prequels count? Because, you know, STAR WARS I, II, III really blow. But we knew that, right? RIGHT?
You could also put the every odd numbered Star Trek movie (or is it even number?). Or the higher you go, the worse they get. I’m curious to see what the reboot sequel brings.
Subsequent Rambo and Rocky films? It’s like you’re not even watching the same movie family. I grew up on the sequels; when I finally watched both originals, I was struck by a) the complete change in tone (dark) and b) that their successors paled in comparison.
Any Eddie Murphy sequel. And I’m talking about in the 80s when he movies didn’t just suck the first time.
OK, my post seems to quickly turning into an extended Gen X post, so I’ll leave it at that.
Yup, the odd numbered Star Treks are the sucky ones, except for the first one. I didn’t see any of the New Generation movies, but the latest one that showed the original characters from their start in Starfleet Academy was **awewome**!
You’re right about the odd number Star Trek films. Rocky films are okay, #4 is great, and #5 with Tommy Gun is bad. I’ve never seen all the Rambo films but did enjoy the most recent one.
Rocky IV is a classic, something I rarely say about the fourth movie in any franchise.
Yep, those are some pretty bad sequels. A couple more to add: Legally Blond II, and Dumb and Dumber II. Those should have never been made.
I never watched either of those for fear of how bad they would be.
I would throw Speed 2:Cruise Control. Have you ever ridden on a cruise. It’s not that fast. The whole premise of the movie is lame. I also would add Batman and Robin. Talk about ruining a franchise. Warner Bros declared that they’d never make another Batman movie after that one. Thankfully the Nolan brothers convinced them otherwise.
Yes and yes. You know your bad sequels!
I never saw Speed 2, but my wife said it sucks and having been on a cruise, I can see what you mean. I forgot about Batman and Robin, otherwise I would’ve put it in there. Horrible!
A while ago, I thought I should start a chapter of SBS. (Society to Ban Sequels). Okay, there are some good ones. Godfather 2, Aliens, Star Wars, even Raiders.
But mostly I despise the very nature of sequels. They’re movies that try to ride the coattails of the success of the first.
I’ll get off my soapbox now. Maybe.
Anyway, SBS could also stand for Search Bomb Shells, so I don’t want to ruin that acronym, eh?
So you are opposed to Pride and Prejudice II: The Divorce of Liz and Time Travel Follies? I was working on a screen version.
If they don’t have a real story to tell (as opposed to rehashing the original) then they should definitely not be made.
Need someone to read that screenplay? Of course, I’m only really interested in Mr. Darcy if he’s played by Colin Firth. I need those brown eyes and that wit.;)
You left out the Land Before Time franchise? There are nearly a dozen of this IIRC
I haven’t kept up on my Land Before Time viewing. Sounds like I’ve missed some winners!
When I saw there were 8 movies, I thought, “Seriously? They’re not extinct yet?” And then there were more.
I never saw past the first one–which came out when I was a kid–but I remember thinking, “Seriously? Eight movies and they’re not extinct yet?” And more followed.
Oh, great, both of my responses posted. Now I look repetitive.
I gotta throw THE OMEN sequels. As horrifying as the original was, the others
Damien: Omen II (1978), Omen III: The Final Conflict (1980), and The Omen (a remake done in 2006) were doubly horrifying.
But not in a good way.
In that heinously sucky way.
In that, “I can’t believe we paid $6 bucks for this movie kind of way.” Or in the case of the 2006 remake: “I can’t believe we paid $1.99 to rent this video.”
I don’t know the originals so well but agree that the modern version was terrible. Definitely a waste of money on every level.
I never saw any of them, but I’ll take your word for it.
I am a die-hard Godfather fan, but I must agree with the assessment of how terrible the third one is…such a huge disappointment. And yet, if it comes on TV, I will always watch it. I mean, c’mon…it’s still Pacino, afterall. 😉
I do like Pacino and even was okay with Godfather III, but when the first film is SO good nothing can top it.
Pacino is a legend; Part III squandered his talent with a bad script.
I didn’t like Legally Blonde 2, and Bad Boys 2 wasn’t quite as good although I did still laugh. I’m hoping The Hangover Part 2 doesn’t let me down this weekend!
You’ll have to tweet what you think of Hangover 2.
The worst ever were Indiana Jones 2 and Jurassic Park 2. First movie – awesome. Second movie – OMG WHAT WERE YOU THINKING.
They must have been pretty bad because I saw none of them! I usually go to the movies my friends recommend, so I assume someone told me to save my $10.
I think it’s a tie between Police Academy and Weekend at Bernie’s…haven’t seen any of the others…
Wendy
I’d add: Star Wars: Empire Strikes Back, Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, and Return of the King, and Serenity (Is Serenity a sequel of Firefly?)
Thanks for stopping by and commenting!!
So all these comments have me thinking about the BEST sequels ever. Is that a thing? So far on my list I have Back to the Future II which I think is phenomenal.
Taking applications for more!
Star Wars: Return of the Jedi. Phenomenal sequel!
Good call!
I’d go Godfather II or Back to the Future II. Both excellent movies I watch over and over. More recently, I thought Deathly Hallows Part 1 was pretty awesome.
I question why most sequels are made other than “show me the money”… that said, Before Sunset, a sequel to Before Sunrise, is the better film, IMHO. Have you ever done a post on the better remake?
Remakes would be an interesting post.
I have not, but I should.
We were just discussing situations when the remake was equal or better. I haven’t seen these two you mention but thanks for the tip!
I actually thought Terminator 3 was pretty gutsy to ditch the whole change the future ending and go with the inevitability of the end of the world. Judgment Day couldn’t be stopped
I agree and actually own that DVD. True story.
I agree with Leanne. The world would be better off without sequels. It’s like a funny spontaneous moment in life gets ruined by each retelling. Except for Terminator 2: Judgment Day. That movie was awesome. Remember when the VHS cassette of that movie retailed for $100?
I also agree that the first Matrix was too good to follow. That movie blew me away.
I remember T2 in the theater! It was the first R rated movie my mom let me see if I went with friend and his dad. And you know how I feel about the Matrix!
You’ve got some doozies on there. I don’t know if they count as sequels, but they are so bad that I would add them to any list that even smells like a bad movies list. That would be the last 3 Star Wars movies made. The first 3 made were awesome. The last three (oddly, numbers 1, 2, and 3 in order of chronology of action) were some of the worst movies of all time in my opinion. Simply vehicles to create happy meal toys. And it was painful to watch the “love scenes” between Darth and Natalie Portman. I’ll cut myself off there before I start a rant. Thanks for a great blog, Clay. All the best.
I’m with you on those new Star Wars movies! I’ll take PBS documentaries over them any day.
The acting in Episodes I-III was pretty horrible, but if II or III come on TV I usually end up watching them for at least a little while. I’m a sucker for lightsaber battles.
Having been to see The Hangover, Part II with a pal last night, it’s safe to say you can add it to the list. I never feel like asking for my money back (well, there was that unfortunate incident with Charlie’s Angels 2), but I did last night. Bloody awful would not even begin to cover it. And I *liked* the original Hangover.
That does not surprise me.
Shouldn’t the new Star Wars movies be considered sequels?
They are but also prequels. Either way they are terrible.
Hmm… Not bothered too much about the sequels. Pirates of the Caribbean III does bother me though. Didn’t like the ending. What’s up with that?
Pirates III was definitely weak. I want to see the new one though.
[…] 8 Worst Movie Sequels EVER. Do you agree? By the brilliant Clay Morgan […]
Pingback by R.D.D.–Reality Deficit Disorder Can Make Us Crazy « Kristen Lamb's Blog | June 1, 2011 |